Analysis The numbers behind the result
Brugge's clinical edge eclipses Lens' higher shot volume
The 3-0 scoreline slightly flattered Club Brugge given the expected goals were closely matched (2.54 vs 2.14), but their ruthless efficiency in front of goal proved decisive. Despite Lens having more total shots (19 vs 11) and forcing more saves (7 vs 5 on target), Brugge converted half of their shots on target while Lens failed to capitalise.
Brugge's superiority came during critical momentum swings just before half-time and early in the second half – Hans Vanaken's opener (45+3') and Joaquin Seys' strike (50') killed Lens' resistance, with both goals coming during their 57% possession spells. Lens' defensive reshuffle at half-time (Baidoo for Todibo) backfired immediately as Seys exploited space. Carlos Forbs' late goal (72') was assisted by substitute Hugo Vetlesen, underlining Brugge's effective use of bench depth. The key differential was finishing: Brugge scored 3 from 5 shots on target (60% conversion) while Lens wasted 7 on-target attempts.